1. Is the design appropriate for answering the questions or testing the hypotheses of the study. 4. Is evidence presented that indicates that each instrument is appropriate for the sample under study?
6. Is reliability discussed in terms of type and size of reliability coefficients? Critique of a Research Article 8. Are the tables and figures (if any) well organized and easy to understand? 6. Are recommendations for future action made? · How was the data analyzed? 3. If parametric tests were used, is there evidence that the researcher avoided violating the 3. Is the method of sample selection described one that is likely to result in a representative, unbiased sample? 8. If an instrument was developed specifically for the study social services in india essay, are the procedures involved in its development and validation described? 8. Are recommendations for future research made? 9. Are the data in each table and figure described in the text? The goal of this activity is to give you an opportunity to apply whatever you learned in this course in evaluating a research paper. You might have done some article summaries or even critical evaluation of some resources. However, this activity is unique because you evaluate a research article from a methodology perspective. · Describe the reliability and validity of all the instruments used. 9. If an instrument was developed specifically for the study, are administration, scoring or tabulating, and interpretation procedures fully described? · Click here to see an example of research critique (see the original paper). 1. Are specific questions to be answered listed or specific hypotheses to be tested stated? For this assignment you summarize and evaluate the attached educational research article. After completing your critique you should submit: 1. Are appropriate descriptive or inferential statistics presented? 5. Are the size and major characteristics of the sample described? 2. Are the procedures described in sufficient detail to permit them to be replicated by another researcher? The critique part should be 2-5 pages (750-2000 words) similar to the following examples in APA style. Your critique should be longer than your summary and you pay special attention to the design and procedure. Your grade on this assignment is based on your answer the following questions. 6. Do the implications discussed form an empirical or theoretical rationale for the hypotheses which follow? 3. Are the instruments appropriate for measuring the intended variables?
7. Are the results clearly presented? How would I critique a medical case report? Answered by wikiHow Contributor How could I critique an article about bullying? How do you critique a learning objective? Answered by wikiHow Contributor "All three methods or steps formed a genuinely helpful article. Methods three and one were helpful, but method two really got to the heart of critiquing. Number seven I have found especially important in my own writing.". " more - Chandler Lewis, 2 months ago "It's comprehensive and effective. I loved it." - A. N. M. Asaduzzaman Fakir order essay cheap, 9 months ago "All in this article helped me a lot, because I can't find information like this in Filipino books. We don't have enough resources for this kind of information. I can make my report because of this case study on social networking, thank you very much.". " more - Rose Ann Salceda, 2 months ago "I am a college student in my 3rd year. My Statistics professor wanted us to critique a statistical study. This article was an easy bad habit essays, thorough read on how to critique an article. Thank you so much for posting this!". " more - Kat Bos critical thinking assessment, 9 months ago Offer a brief opinion of your own to entice the reader. For example, you may write, "Brown's research study was flawed, however essay writing my favorite food, making his conclusions irrelevant." Determine whether enough information is presented to accurately arrive at the conclusion. Make sure the review flows well and presents the author’s reasoning in a clear manner. Look to see if the information provided by the writer is relevant to the subject he's reviewing. The writer's findings should be coherent and well blended. The information presented by the writer should explain the topic without causing the reader to draw up too many questions. Double-check any data, evidence or examples provided by the author to make sure the information doesn't contain flaws in interpretation. Also, determine if the data, evidence or examples support the conclusion or idea. Make sure the evidence provided comes from credible and reliable sources. Ask yourself if you can understand how the evidence relates to the conclusion.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
ArchivesCategories |